It’s time once again to do what we like to call Bracketology — College Hockey Style. It’s our weekly look at how the NCAA tournament might shape up if the season ended today.<\/p>\n
It’s a look into the possible thought processes behind selecting and seeding the NCAA tournament teams.<\/p>\n
This is the latest installment of Bracketology, and we’ll be bringing you a new one every week until we make our final picks before the field is announced. And this year, check out our Bracketology blog, where we’ll keep you entertained, guessing and educated throughout the rest of the season.<\/p>\n
Here are the facts:<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2 Sixteen teams are selected to participate in the national tournament.<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2 There are four regional sites (East – Bridgeport, Conn., Northeast – Manchester, N.H., Midwest – Grand Rapids, Mich., West – Minneapolis, Minn.)<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2 A host institution which is invited to the tournament plays in the regional for which it is the host, and cannot be moved. There are four host institutions this year, Yale in Bridgeport, New Hampshire in Manchester, Western Michigan in Grand Rapids and Minnesota in Minneapolis.<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2 Seedings will not be switched, as opposed to years past. To avoid undesirable first-round matchups, including intraconference games (see below), teams will be moved among regionals, not reseeded.<\/p>\n
Here are the NCAA’s guidelines on the matter, per a meeting of the Championship Committee:<\/p>\n
In setting up the tournament, the committee begins with a list of priorities to ensure a successful tournament on all fronts including competitive equity, financial success and likelihood of playoff-type atmosphere at each regional site. For the model, the following is a basic set of priorities:<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2 The top four teams as ranked by the committee are the four No. 1 seeds and will be placed in the bracket so that if all four teams advance to the Men’s Frozen Four, the No. 1 seed will play the No. 4 seed and the No. 2 seed will play the No. 3 seed in the semifinals.<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2 Host institutions that qualify will be placed at home.<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2 No. 1 seeds are placed as close to home as possible in order of their ranking 1-4.<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2 Conference matchups in first round are avoided, unless five or more teams from one conference are selected, then the integrity of the bracket will be preserved.<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2 Once the six automatic qualifiers and 10 at-large teams are selected, the next step is to develop four groups from the committee’s ranking of 1-16. The top four teams are the No. 1 seeds. The next four are targeted as No. 2 seeds. The next four are No. 3 seeds and the last four are No. 4 seeds. These groupings will be referred to as “bands.”<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2 A geographic proximity-based bracketing technique is still under consideration by the NCAA. If it does happen, we’ll talk more about it later on.<\/p>\n
Given these facts, here are the top 16 of the current PairWise Rankings (PWR), and the conference leaders (through all games of January 28, 2009): <\/p>\n
1 Boston University
\n2 Notre Dame
\n3 Cornell
\n4t Northeastern
\n4t Minnesota
\n6t Vermont
\n6t Michigan
\n8t Denver
\n8t Princeton
\n8t Miami
\n11 Ohio State
\n12 Boston College
\n13 New Hampshire
\n14t Minnesota-Duluth
\n14t North Dakota
\n16 Yale
\n18 Air Force
\n— Niagara<\/p>\nCurrent conference leaders:<\/p>\n
Atlantic Hockey: Air Force
\nCHA: Niagara
\nCCHA: Notre Dame
\nECAC: Cornell
\nHockey East: Northeastern
\nWCHA: Denver<\/p>\nNotes<\/b><\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2 Bracketology assumes that the season has ended and there are no more games to be played — i.e., the NCAA tournament starts tomorrow.<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u00a2 Because there are an uneven number of games played inside each conference, I will be using winning percentage, not points accumulated, to determine the current leader in each conference. This team is my assumed conference tournament champion.<\/p>\n
Step One<\/b> <\/p>\n
From the committee’s report, choose the 16 teams in the tournament. <\/p>\n
We break ties in the PWR by looking at the individual comparisons among the tied teams, and add in any current league leaders that are not currently in the Top 16. The only teams that are not are Niagara and Air Force.<\/p>\n
From there, we can start looking at the ties in a more detailed fashion.<\/p>\n
The ties consist of Northeastern and Minnesota at 4, Vermont and Michigan at 6, Denver, Princeton and Miami at 8, and Minnesota-Duluth and North Dakota at 14.<\/p>\n
Looking at the head-to-head PairWise comparisons we break most of our ties. Northeastern, Vermont and Minnesota-Duluth win.<\/p>\n
As for the round-robin at 8, we can break via the RPI, meaning the order of Denver, Princeton and then Miami.<\/p>\n
Therefore the 16 teams in the tournament, in rank order, are:<\/p>\n
1 Boston University
\n2 Notre Dame
\n3 Cornell
\n4 Northeastern
\n5 Minnesota
\n6 Vermont
\n7 Michigan
\n8 Denver
\n9 Princeton
\n10 Miami
\n11 Ohio State
\n12 Boston College
\n13 New Hampshire
\n14 Minnesota-Duluth
\n15 Air Force
\n16 Niagara <\/p>\nStep Two<\/b><\/p>\n
Now it’s time to assign the seeds.<\/p>\n
No. 1 Seeds – Boston University, Notre Dame, Cornell, Northeastern
\nNo. 2 Seeds – Minnesota, Vermont, Michigan, Denver
\nNo. 3 Seeds – Princeton, Miami, Ohio State, Boston College
\nNo. 4 Seeds – New Hampshire, Minnesota-Duluth, Air Force, Niagara<\/p>\nStep Three<\/b> <\/p>\n
Place the No. 1 seeds in regionals. Following the guidelines, there are no host teams in this grouping, so that rule does not need to be enforced. <\/p>\n
No. 1 Boston University is placed in the Northeast Regional in Manchester.
\nNo. 2 Notre Dame is placed in the Midwest Regional in Grand Rapids.
\nNo. 3 Cornell is placed in the East Regional in Bridgeport.
\nNo. 4 Northeastern is placed in the West Regional in Minneapolis.<\/p>\nStep Four<\/b> <\/p>\n
Now we place the other 12 teams so as to avoid intraconference matchups if possible. <\/p>\n
Begin by filling in each bracket by banding groups. Remember that teams are not<\/i> assigned to the regional closest to their campus sites by ranking order within the banding (unless you are a host school, in which case you must be assigned to your home regional). <\/p>\n
If this is the case, as it was last year, then the committee should seed so that the quarterfinals are seeded such that the four regional championships are played by No. 1 v. No. 8, No. 2 v. No. 7, No. 3 v. No. 6 and No. 4 v. No. 5.<\/p>\n
So therefore:<\/p>\n
No. 2 Seeds<\/i> <\/p>\n
No. 5 Minnesota, as a host school, is placed in No. 4 Northeastern’s Regional, the West Regional.
\nNo. 8 Denver is placed in No. 1 Boston University’s Regional, the Northeast Regional.
\nNo. 7 Michigan is placed in No. 2 Notre Dame’s Regional, the Midwest Regional.
\nNo. 6 Vermont is placed in No. 3 Cornell’s Regional, the East Regional.<\/p>\nNo. 3 Seeds<\/i> <\/p>\n
Our bracketing system has one Regional containing seeds 1, 8, 9, and 16, another with 2, 7, 10, 15, another with 3, 6, 11, 14 and another with 4, 5, 12 and 13.<\/p>\n
Therefore:<\/p>\n
No. 9 Princeton is placed in No. 8 Denver’s Regional, the Northeast Regional.
\nNo. 10 Miami is placed in No. 7 Michigan’s Regional, the Midwest Regional.
\nNo. 11 Ohio State is placed in No. 6 Vermont’s Regional, the East Regional
\nNo. 12 Boston College is placed in No. 5 Minnesota’s Regional, the West Regional. <\/p>\nNo. 4 Seeds<\/i> <\/p>\n
One more time, taking No. 16 v. No. 1, No. 15 v. No. 2, etc. <\/p>\n
No. 13 New Hampshire, as a host school, is placed in No. 1 Boston University’s Regional, the Northeast Regional.
\nNo. 16 Niagara is sent to No. 2 Notre Dame’s Regional, the Midwest Regional.
\nNo. 15 Air Force is sent to No. 3 Cornell’s Regional, the East Regional.
\nNo. 14 Boston College is sent to No. 3 Notre Dame’s Regional, the Midwest Regional.
\nNo. 13 Minnesota-Duluth is sent to No. 4 Northeastern’s Regional, the West Regional.<\/p>\nThe brackets as we have set them up:<\/p>\n
West Regional: <\/p>\n
Minnesota-Duluth vs. Northeastern
\nBoston College vs. Minnesota<\/p>\nMidwest Regional: <\/p>\n
Niagara vs. Notre Dame
\nMiami vs. Michigan<\/p>\nEast Regional: <\/p>\n
Air Force vs. Cornell
\nOhio State vs. Vermont<\/p>\nNortheast Regional: <\/p>\n
New Hampshire vs. Boston University
\nPrinceton vs. Denver <\/p>\nOur first concern is avoiding intra-conference matchups. We have Miami vs. Michigan and New Hampshire vs. Boston University.<\/p>\n
To solve the Miami vs. Michigan matchup, we can switch Miami with Boston College.<\/p>\n
As for the New Hampshire vs. Boston University matchup, we can’t move New Hampshire. So what do we do? Can we move Boston University? What if we switched Boston University with Cornell?<\/p>\n
That would seem to make sense. The two highest eastern seeds are still in the eastern regionals.<\/p>\n
So we now have:<\/p>\n
West Regional: <\/p>\n
Minnesota-Duluth vs. Northeastern
\nMiami vs. Minnesota<\/p>\nMidwest Regional: <\/p>\n
Niagara vs. Notre Dame
\nBoston College vs. Michigan<\/p>\nEast Regional: <\/p>\n
Air Force vs. Boston University
\nOhio State vs. Vermont<\/p>\nNortheast Regional: <\/p>\n
New Hampshire vs. Cornell
\nPrinceton vs. Denver <\/p>\nIs there anything else we can do?<\/p>\n
We can switch Air Force and Niagara, seeing as how we can keep Niagara in an eastern regional to perhaps draw some more attendance.<\/p>\n
So our tournament now is:<\/p>\n
West Regional: <\/p>\n
Minnesota-Duluth vs. Northeastern
\nMiami vs. Minnesota<\/p>\nMidwest Regional: <\/p>\n
Air Force vs. Notre Dame
\nBoston College vs. Michigan<\/p>\nEast Regional: <\/p>\n
Niagara vs. Boston University
\nOhio State vs. Vermont<\/p>\nNortheast Regional: <\/p>\n
New Hampshire vs. Cornell
\nPrinceton vs. Denver <\/p>\nAnd that’s what we’ll stick with this week.<\/p>\n
Now let’s take a look at what would happen should the geographic bracketing rule be adopted.<\/p>\n
Remember, it’s all about geography, except for the number-one seeds, which can be sent anywhere.<\/p>\n
Let’s take a look at what I think would happen should this go into effect:<\/p>\n
West Regional: <\/p>\n
Minnesota-Duluth vs. Northeastern
\nOhio State vs. Minnesota<\/p>\nMidwest Regional: <\/p>\n
Air Force vs. Notre Dame
\nMiami vs. Michigan<\/p>\nEast Regional: <\/p>\n
Niagara vs. Cornell
\nPrinceton vs. Denver<\/p>\nNortheast Regional: <\/p>\n
New Hampshire vs. Boston University
\nBoston College vs. Vermont<\/p>\nAnd that’s what I think the tournament would look like, based upon geography.<\/p>\n
We have interchangeable parts here if you look at it. We can avoid an all-Hockey East Regional by switching Denver and Vermont.<\/p>\n
We can also interchange Miami and Ohio State.<\/p>\n
So there you have it, the bracket should the geographic bracketing initiative pass.<\/p>\n
Check the blog for updates and thoughts and we’ll see you here next week for the next Bracketology.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The latest edition of Bracketology is here. Jayson Moy offers his third weekly installment of who’s in, who’s out, who’s up and who’s down in the NCAA selection process.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":140328,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Bracketology: Jan. 28, 2009 - College Hockey | USCHO.com<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The latest edition of Bracketology is here. Jayson Moy offers his third weekly installment of who's in, who's out, who's up and who's down in the NCAA selection process.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30267\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bracketology: Jan. 28, 2009 - College Hockey | USCHO.com\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The latest edition of Bracketology is here. Jayson Moy offers his third weekly installment of who's in, who's out, who's up and who's down in the NCAA selection process.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30267\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"College Hockey | USCHO.com\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/OfficialUSCHO\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-28T16:56:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2010-08-18T00:57:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/uscho_featured-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jayson Moy\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@USCHO\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@USCHO\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jayson Moy\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2009\/01\/28\/bracketology-jan-28-2009\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2009\/01\/28\/bracketology-jan-28-2009\/\",\"name\":\"Bracketology: Jan. 28, 2009 - College Hockey | USCHO.com\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2009\/01\/28\/bracketology-jan-28-2009\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2009\/01\/28\/bracketology-jan-28-2009\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-28T16:56:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2010-08-18T00:57:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5c2cea64cc964ec8368242f6397de9d0\"},\"description\":\"The latest edition of Bracketology is here. Jayson Moy offers his third weekly installment of who's in, who's out, who's up and who's down in the NCAA selection process.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2009\/01\/28\/bracketology-jan-28-2009\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2009\/01\/28\/bracketology-jan-28-2009\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2009\/01\/28\/bracketology-jan-28-2009\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg\",\"width\":1175,\"height\":763},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2009\/01\/28\/bracketology-jan-28-2009\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bracketology: Jan. 28, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/\",\"name\":\"College Hockey | USCHO.com\",\"description\":\"Men's and Women's D-I and D-III College Hockey News, Features, Scores, Statistics, Fan Forum, Blogs\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5c2cea64cc964ec8368242f6397de9d0\",\"name\":\"Jayson Moy\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/0844fd38a6823ecd776d66f78a8809cc\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74ee8f7930ed5a3d4781a8ff3e4eb3f5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74ee8f7930ed5a3d4781a8ff3e4eb3f5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jayson Moy\"},\"description\":\"Senior Writer Jayson Moy is a senior writer and has been with USCHO since its inception. He covered the ECAC from 1996 to 2003 and is the 2001 recipient of the ECAC Media Recognition Award. He has been writing Bracketology since 2004 and has never missed predicting the NCAA field.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/author\/jayson\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bracketology: Jan. 28, 2009 - College Hockey | USCHO.com","description":"The latest edition of Bracketology is here. Jayson Moy offers his third weekly installment of who's in, who's out, who's up and who's down in the NCAA selection process.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30267","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bracketology: Jan. 28, 2009 - College Hockey | USCHO.com","og_description":"The latest edition of Bracketology is here. Jayson Moy offers his third weekly installment of who's in, who's out, who's up and who's down in the NCAA selection process.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30267","og_site_name":"College Hockey | USCHO.com","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/OfficialUSCHO\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-28T16:56:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2010-08-18T00:57:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":1024,"url":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/uscho_featured-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Jayson Moy","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@USCHO","twitter_site":"@USCHO","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jayson Moy","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2009\/01\/28\/bracketology-jan-28-2009\/","url":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2009\/01\/28\/bracketology-jan-28-2009\/","name":"Bracketology: Jan. 28, 2009 - College Hockey | USCHO.com","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2009\/01\/28\/bracketology-jan-28-2009\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2009\/01\/28\/bracketology-jan-28-2009\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg","datePublished":"2009-01-28T16:56:11+00:00","dateModified":"2010-08-18T00:57:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5c2cea64cc964ec8368242f6397de9d0"},"description":"The latest edition of Bracketology is here. Jayson Moy offers his third weekly installment of who's in, who's out, who's up and who's down in the NCAA selection process.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2009\/01\/28\/bracketology-jan-28-2009\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2009\/01\/28\/bracketology-jan-28-2009\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2009\/01\/28\/bracketology-jan-28-2009\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg","width":1175,"height":763},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2009\/01\/28\/bracketology-jan-28-2009\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bracketology: Jan. 28, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/","name":"College Hockey | USCHO.com","description":"Men's and Women's D-I and D-III College Hockey News, Features, Scores, Statistics, Fan Forum, Blogs","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5c2cea64cc964ec8368242f6397de9d0","name":"Jayson Moy","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/0844fd38a6823ecd776d66f78a8809cc","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74ee8f7930ed5a3d4781a8ff3e4eb3f5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74ee8f7930ed5a3d4781a8ff3e4eb3f5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jayson Moy"},"description":"Senior Writer Jayson Moy is a senior writer and has been with USCHO since its inception. He covered the ECAC from 1996 to 2003 and is the 2001 recipient of the ECAC Media Recognition Award. He has been writing Bracketology since 2004 and has never missed predicting the NCAA field.","url":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/author\/jayson\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30267"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30267"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30267\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/140328"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30267"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30267"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30267"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=30267"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}