{"id":26526,"date":"2004-05-26T19:16:38","date_gmt":"2004-05-27T00:16:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2004\/05\/26\/ecac-mulls-applicants-pros-and-cons\/"},"modified":"2010-08-17T19:55:42","modified_gmt":"2010-08-18T00:55:42","slug":"ecac-mulls-applicants-pros-and-cons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2004\/05\/26\/ecac-mulls-applicants-pros-and-cons\/","title":{"rendered":"ECAC Mulls Applicants’ Pros and Cons"},"content":{"rendered":"
The ECAC will hear formal proposals today at Yale from five schools that have applied for admittance into the hockey conference for the 2005-06 season.<\/p>\n
The ECAC opened up the process after it learned that Vermont intended to depart the ECAC for Hockey East after next season. The five schools that have applied are current CHA school Niagara, and Sacred Heart, Quinnipiac, Holy Cross and Mercyhurst, which all play in Atlantic Hockey on the men’s side. Quinnipiac and Mercyhurst will be part of the CHA women’s league next season.<\/p>\n
ECAC officials are keeping an open mind, but there are always preconceived notions going into any process like this. And there appears to be as many notions as there are people involved.<\/p>\n
“The coaches are talking about the proximity to Ontario for Niagara, the ADs are talking about the academics at Holy Cross and others talking about the facilities coming on board at Quinnipiac,” said Ken Ralph, athletic director at Rensselaer. “So every school has something that works best for everyone.”<\/p>\n