Minnesota vs. Mercyhurst \nFerris State vs. North Dakota <\/p>\n
Colorado College vs. Wayne State \nBoston College vs. Michigan <\/p>\n
Cornell vs. St. Cloud State \nBoston University vs. Ohio State <\/p>\n
New Hampshire vs. Minnesota State \nMaine vs. Harvard <\/p>\n
Maine and Boston College swapped regionals.\nThose were the only three differences in our bracket with the actual NCAA bracket. So what happened?<\/p>\n
Let’s spell out the actual NCAA tournament, using the seeds shown above.<\/p>\n
West Regional \n3 Minnesota vs. 15 Mercyhurst \n7 Ferris State vs. 10 North Dakota<\/p>\n
Midwest Regional \n2 Colorado College vs. 16 Wayne State \n6 Maine vs. 9 Michigan<\/p>\n
East Regional \n1 Cornell vs. 13 Minnesota State \n8 Boston College vs. 11 Ohio State<\/p>\n
Northeast Regional \n4 New Hampshire vs. 14 St. Cloud State \n5 Boston University vs. 12 Harvard<\/p>\n
The first thing that stands out is an element the committee wanted to preserve, something that selection committee chair Ian McCaw called “competitive equity.”<\/p>\n
It appears that the committee wanted to set it up so that the regional finals had 1 vs. 8, 2 vs. 7, 3 vs. 6 and 4 vs. 5.<\/p>\n
This did not happen in the two western regionals, where it could not be done because of the fact that Minnesota and Michigan are host schools.<\/p>\n
This explains a lot.<\/p>\n
Most particularly, it explains why Maine was sent to the Midwest Regional and Boston College to the East Regional. The committee made sure that the if all the top seeds advance, that the regional finals would have the No. 1 team playing the No. 8 team.<\/p>\n
The same reasoning puts Cornell in the East Regional and New Hampshire in the Northeast. Because BU is locked into the Northeast Regional as host, that would put BU, the No. 5 team overall, against No. 4, which in this case is New Hampshire.<\/p>\n
And with Ohio State and Harvard in the two eastern regionals, who plays whom? vWell, Harvard, as No. 12, should play No. 5 in the first round. Therefore, the Harvard-BU matchup; at the same time, the two ECAC teams end up in different regionals.<\/p>\n
There is still one more difference to be explained.<\/p>\n
It seems that Cornell is playing a higher seed in the first round than New Hampshire, i.e., Cornell is playing Minnesota State rather than St. Cloud State, even though Minnesota State is a higher seed than St. Cloud State in the straight PairWise.<\/p>\n
For this, we go to the “bonus.”<\/p>\n
Using the bonus as we have done in the past — .005 for a good road win, .003 for a good neutral win, and .001 for a good home win — the top 16 changes in one way. St. Cloud moves past Minnesota State, and we see why Cornell plays Minnesota State: MSU is the lowest-ranked team available.<\/p>\n
As McCaw said, the committee went by the numbers and tried to preserve competitive equity while avoiding intra-conference matchups.<\/p>\n
That’s exactly what they did, and that’s why the tournament field is the way it is.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The field is in, and we evaluate our prediction performance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":140328,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Bracketology: Analysis - College Hockey | USCHO.com<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n