{"id":18214,"date":"2013-11-30T23:49:32","date_gmt":"2013-12-01T05:49:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.uscho.com\/recaps\/?p=18214"},"modified":"2013-12-01T00:16:31","modified_gmt":"2013-12-01T06:16:31","slug":"boston-university-stifles-cornells-power-play-wins-red-hot-hockey-at-madison-square-garden","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/recaps\/2013\/11\/30\/boston-university-stifles-cornells-power-play-wins-red-hot-hockey-at-madison-square-garden\/","title":{"rendered":"Boston University stifles Cornell’s power play, wins ‘Red Hot Hockey’ at Madison Square Garden"},"content":{"rendered":"
NEW YORK<\/b> — Cornell came into Saturday night’s “Red Hot Hockey” game with the nation’s second-best power play, but failed on six man-advantage chances and left Madison Square Garden with a 3-2 loss to Boston University.<\/p>\n
The Big Red had scored seven power-play goals in its previous five games, but were stopped cold thanks to the hot hand of Terriers’ sophomore goalie Matt O’Connor.<\/p>\n
“BU did a great job on the penalty kill,” Cornell coach Mike Schafer said. “Your goalie can be your best penalty killer and O’Connor proved that tonight and he deserves credit, but we also shot ourselves in the foot when our guys refused to shoot on one-timers and force the puck to the net. I felt there was too much hesitation, trying for the perfect shot. We needed to bring more pucks to the net.”<\/p>\n
Despite having a size advantage over the Terriers, Cornell often was careless with the puck and was outworked by BU’s smaller skaters.<\/p>\n
“We had way too many turnovers along the boards,’ Schafer added.<\/p>\n
Boston University coach David Quinn was pleasantly surprised with the effectiveness of his team’s penalty killing.<\/p>\n
“Penalty killing drains players, but my guys kept at it, especially through those four penalties in the second period,” Quinn said. “We kept the puck moving and worked hard to put ourselves in a position to win.<\/p>\n
“I thought Cornell spent a lot of time cycling and on the perimeter, but we competed well with a bigger team in one-on-one [situations]. Our main goal was to try not to give them too much time and space on the penalty kill and we did a good job of that.”<\/p>\n